Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 19;5:66. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03030-7

Table 2.

Comparison of the effect of larval competition on the temperature-dependence of population fitness (rm) and its component traits.

Trait Temperature (°C) Resource level (mg ml−1) Mean ± s.e.m.
0.183 0.367 0.550 0.733
Development time (days) 22 18.30 ± 0.56 (n = 20) 14.41 ± 0.34 (n = 34) 13.41 ± 0.25 (n = 54) 13.33 ± 0.25 (n = 51)
26 10.45 ± 0.18 (n = 65) 10.35 ± 0.20 (n = 51) 9.32 ± 0.19 (n = 44) 9.19 ± 0.17 (n = 53)
32 10.11 ± 0.32 (n = 19) 6.98 ± 0.13 (n = 54) 6.78 ± 0.13 (n = 50) 7.19 ± 0.13 (n = 53)
34 8.26 ± 0.19 (n = 34) 7.04 ± 0.14 (n = 51) 6.67 ± 0.15 (n = 36) 7.87 ± 0.20 (n = 30)
Juvenile mortality rate (individual−1 day−1) 22 0.05 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.04 ± 0.01 (n = 71) 0.02 ± 0.00 (n = 67) 0.03 ± 0.01 (n = 75)
26 0.06 ± 0.01 (n = 150) 0.02 ± 0.01 (n = 65) 0.04 ± 0.01 (n = 63) 0.03 ± 0.01 (n = 74)
32 0.09 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.04 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.05 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.05 ± 0.01 (n = 75)
34 0.14 ± 0.01 (n = 150) 0.05 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.09 ± 0.01 (n = 75) 0.10 ± 0.01 (n = 75)
36 0.18 ± 0.02 (n = 75) 0.17 ± 0.02 (n = 75) 0.18 ± 0.02 (n = 75) 0.27 ± 0.03 (n = 75)
Adult lifespan (days) 22 8.00 ± 0.70 (n = 20) 7.50 ± 0.54 (n = 34) 10.04 ± 0.43 (n = 54) 11.24 ± 0.45 (n = 49)
26 4.54 ± 0.39 (n = 65) 9.39 ± 0.45 (n = 49) 11.51 ± 0.48 (n = 43) 11.65 ± 0.43 (n = 52)
32 5.21 ± 0.72 (n = 19) 8.53 ± 0.43 (n = 53) 8.66 ± 0.44 (n = 50) 9.29 ± 0.43 (n = 52)
34 3.76 ± 0.54 (n = 34) 5.62 ± 0.44 (n = 50) 6.09 ± 0.53 (n = 35) 4.68 ± 0.59 (n = 28)
Body size (dry mass (mg)) 22 0.30 ± 0.01 (n = 20) 0.31 ± 0.01 (n = 32) 0.44 ± 0.01 (n = 52) 0.52 ± 0.01 (n = 46)
26 0.23 ± 0.01 (n = 20) 0.36 ± 0.01 (n = 31) 0.50 ± 0.01 (n = 29) 0.58 ± 0.01 (n = 21)
32 0.19 ± 0.01 (n = 19) 0.34 ± 0.01 (n = 29) 0.38 ± 0.01 (n = 31) 0.36 ± 0.01 (n = 30)
34 0.17 ± 0.02 (n = 9) 0.30 ± 0.01 (n = 30) 0.36 ± 0.01 (n = 27) 0.26 ± 0.01 (n = 23)
Daily fecundity rate (eggs individual−1 day−1) 22 1.77 ± 0.06 (n = 20) 1.95 ± 0.05 (n = 32) 1.99 ± 0.06 (n = 52) 2.59 ± 0.54 (n = 46)
26 1.52 ± 0.07 (n = 20) 1.96 ± 0.08 (n = 31) 2.54 ± 0.37 (n = 29) 3.00 ± 0.30 (n = 21)
32 3.79 ± 0.26 (n = 19) 3.04 ± 0.33 (n = 29) 3.55 ± 0.51 (n = 31) 2.64 ± 0.22 (n = 30)
34 6.87 ± 1.87 (n = 9) 5.07 ± 0.82 (n = 30) 4.91 ± 0.52 (n = 27) 5.76 ± 0.89 (n = 23)
Population-level fitness (rm) 22 ‒0.05 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.02 0.10 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.02
26 0.05 ± 0.02 0.12 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.02 0.16 ± 0.02
32 ‒0.04 ± 0.04 0.24 ± 0.02 0.23 ± 0.03 0.20 ± 0.03
34 ‒0.21 ± 0.05 0.22 ± 0.03 0.15 ± 0.04 0.02 ± 0.05
36 ‒2.10 ± 0.15 ‒2.11 ± 0.21 ‒2.19 ± 0.22 ‒2.68 ± 0.20

The means with standard errors for juvenile mortality rate were estimated by fitting an exponential function to survival data for each treatment using the ‘flexsurv’ R package. The means with standard errors for development time, lifespan and size were estimated by using the statistical models in Table 1 (replicate dropped). For fecundity, the standard errors were estimated using the ‘Rmisc’ package in R. For rm, 95% CIs were approximated using the delta method75. The number of individual mosquitoes is shown in parentheses (n = ) after the means for each treatment. For rm TPC fitting, non-positive matrix projection rm values at 36 °C were adjusted to ‒0.30. For plotting (Fig. 2a), non-positive rm values were cut off at ‒0.10.