Table 3.
First author | Country | Population | Main results | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Outcomes | Higher SDMT | Lower SDMT | |||
Campbell et al. (25) | UK | 62 | Employment rate | 60–80: 100% 50–60: ~60% |
40–50: ~45% 30–40: ~20% 20–30: ~0% |
Fraser et al. (28) | US | 95 | OR for fully employed vs. unemployed for a 1 SD difference in measure | SDMT written – 1.76 (0.89–3.53) SDMT oral – 1.46 (0.75–2.83) |
|
Morrow et al. (27) | US | 97 | Adjusted OR was 4.2 (95% CI, 1.2–14.8) of a deterioration in employment (paid disability benefits or a reduction in working hours) based on a change of SDMT by 4.0 |
CI, confidence intervals; OR, odds ratio; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Bold values shows the estimate.