Table 6.

Summary of improvements for all participants.

Improvement summary classification	Participants	Total
Highly effective	A2, B1, B2, B3, B5, B7, C5, D3	8
Moderately effective	A1, A3, A5, B4, C1, C2, C4, C6, D2, E4, E6	11
Less effective	A4, B6, C3, D1, D4, D5, E1, E2, E3, E5	10
Did not finish	A6, A7, A8, C7, C8, D6, D7, D8, E7, E8	10

Classification summary of each participant into an effectiveness group is based on author consensus of the following criteria relating to Supplementary Table 29 in the Supplementary Material section: Highly effective = 1 x “High” rating in three different categories, or “High” and “Mod” ratings across all categories; Moderately effective = 1 x “Mod” rating in three different categories, or at least 1 x “High” rating; and Less effective = 1 x “Less” rating in three different categories.