Davey 1994.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomised controlled trial | |
Participants | Preterm infants with birth weight < 2000 g who were clinically stable and who had an umbilical artery catheter in place Infants were excluded if they had a lethal condition or had received a double‐volume exchange transfusion Setting: Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, USA (study dates not stated) |
|
Interventions | Delayed introduction of enteral feeds (median 5 days; 31 infants) versus earlier introduction (median 2 days; 31 infants) Infants received either breast milk or diluted formula (no subgroup data available) |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | A trial inclusion criterion for birth weight was < 2000 g (mean birth weight 1100 g; > 80% of infants were VLBW or very preterm) Infants in the delayed introduction group commenced enteral feeds when the umbilical artery catheter had been removed for 24 hours and the infant was clinically stable and infants in the earlier introduction group commenced feeds with the umbilical artery catheter in situ |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Sequence generation method not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed opaque envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unmasked |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Unmasked |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Complete cohort assessed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Unlikely |
Other bias | Low risk | No evidence baseline imbalance |