Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan;39(1):323–327. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.323-327.2001

TABLE 1.

C. dubliniensis and C. albicans isolates used in this study

Yeast species and country of isolation No. of isolates Chlamydospore production (no. of isolates)
Source or reference
SA
CAF
RAT
+ + +
C. dubliniensisa
 Argentina 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 24
 Australia 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 25
 Belgium 5 5 0 5 0 5 0 16
 Canada 6 4 2 5 1 6 0 16
 Finland 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 16
 France 9 5 4 8 1 9 0 This study
 Germany 4 4 0 3 1 4 0 16
 Greece 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 16
 India 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 This study
 Israel 3 1 2 3 0 3 0 17
 Ireland 41 36 5 36 5 41 0 16, 25, this study
 Japan 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 This study
 Malta 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 This study
 Norway 5 4 1 0 5 5 0 This study
 Spain 5 5 0 4 1 5 0 1
 Switzerland 3 3 0 2 1 3 0 23
 United Kingdom 18 16 2 16 2 18 0 16
 United States 22 20 2 19 3 22 0 15, this study
  Total 130 111 19 109 21 130 0
C. albicansa
 Australia 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 16
 Hong Kong 6 0 6 0 6 6 0 16
 Ireland 61 0 61 0 61 61 0 16, this study
 United Kingdom 2 0 2 0 2 2 0 16
 United States 96 0 96 0 96 96 0 15
  Total 166 0 166 0 166 166 0
a

C. dubliniensis type strain CD36 (25) produced abundant chlamydospores on all three media, whereas C. albicans reference strains 132A (serotype B) (6) and 179A (serotype A) (6) only produced chlamydospores on RAT.