Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 29;53(1):2711. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2748

Table II.

Psychological outcome measures as measured at baseline (T1) and the end of the rehabilitation programme (T2), mean/median difference and statistical results (n = 20)

Variables T1 T2 Diff T2–T1 pvalue Effect size
HADS-A (n = 19)*, mean (SD) 8.3 (5.1) 6.4 (4.4) –1.9 0.03 0.4
HADS-A, median (range) 9.0 (0–16) 6.5 (0–21) –2.5 0.13 0.3
HADS-D (n = 19)*, mean (SD) 4.9 (3.5) 4.1 (3.1) –0.8 0.01 0.3
HADS-D, median (range) 4.5 (0–14) 4.0 (0–16) –0.5 0.13 0.1
EQ-VAS, mean (SD) 67.3 (20.7) 77.3 (17.1) 9.9 0.05 0.5
SOC-29 CP, median (range) 41.0 (27–58) 42.5 (27–56) 1.5 0.85
SOC-29 MA, median (range) 46.5 (21–65) 44.5 (27–63) –2.0 0.99
SOC-29 ME, median (range) 41.0 (21–52) 36.5 (27–54) –4.5 0.48

Effect size (Cohen’s d) was calculated when the p-value was < 0.2. Effect sizes < 0.2 are considered trivial, 0.2 represents a small effect size, 0.5 a medium effect size, and 0.8 a large effect size (34). p-value ≤ 0.05 in bold. HADS-A: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Anxiety; HADS-D: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression; EQ-VAS: EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale; SOC-29 CP: Sense of Coherence – 29 item scale, Comprehensibility; SOC-29 MA: Sense of Coherence – 29 item scale, Manageability; SOC-29 ME: Sense of Coherence – 29 item scale, Meaningfulness; Diff: difference; SD: standard deviation.

*

Outlier excluded.