Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 20.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2021 Sep 1;75(10):2425–2440. doi: 10.1111/evo.14319

Table 1.

♀M/♂P females from heterospecific crosses are more likely to be dysgenic than ♀M/♂P females from conspecific crosses.

Temp (°C) ♀M/P ♀M/M Proportion test
Total Mean CI Total Mean CI χ 2 df P-value
sim × ♂ sim 25 2100 0.982 [0.975, 0.987] 1960 0.999 [0.996, 1.000] 28.574 1 <0.0001
mau × ♂ sim 25 980 0.851 [0.827, 0.872] 980 1.000 [0.996, 1.000] 44.175 1 <0.0001
sech × ♂ sim 25 980 0.821 [0.796, 0.844] 980 0.986 [0.976, 0.992] 18.593 1 <0.0001
sim × ♂ sim 29 2100 0.829 [0.812, 0.844] 1960 0.988 [0.982, 0.992] 299.22 1 <0.0001
mau × ♂ sim 29 980 0.728 [0.699, 0.754] 980 1.000 [0.996, 1.000] 44.175 1 <0.0001
sech × ♂ sim 29 980 0.740 [0.711, 0.766] 980 1.000 [0.996, 1.000] 18.593 1 <0.0001

Females with atrophied ovaries are more common in heterospecific than in conspecific crosses in this direction of the cross. Each row shows a type of cross. Temp (°C): Temperature (°C); Mean: number of nondysgenic females; CI: Binomial confidence interval. We used two-sample tests for equality of proportions (2sEP) for all comparisons and adjusted the P-values with a Bonferroni correction.