Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 17;9(1):46–57. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1859

Table 1.

Phased Participatory Approach

Phase Objective Stakeholders involved Methods: Decision-making Output
1) Initiation and preparation To understand the EuroCAB context and review existing M&E practices Project team Document analysis, informal conversations Not applicable Preliminary case description
2) Collection, exchange, and integration of information To reflect on the collaboration processes and experiences with M&E to identify meaningful metrics and iteratively develop and refine the framework 23 CAB members
4 industry representatives
Project team
Reflection sessions, 2 group sessions, and 6 one-to-one sessions CAB members’ and industry representatives’ insights were used to develop the theory of change model and draft a set of potentially relevant metrics Preliminary framework consisting of a theory of change and tailored set of possible metrics
3) Priority setting To prioritize the identified objectives and metrics to develop a set of meaningful metrics 24 CAB members
6 industry representatives
Questionnaire CAB members’ and industry representatives’ rankings were used to cluster metrics into groups of low, medium, and high priority Ranking of most important objectives and most relevant metrics
4) Validation and planning To validate the theory of change and set of metrics for M&E and to gather ideas for data collection and reporting 3 CAB members
5 industry representatives
Project team
Digital dialogue workshop CAB members and industry representatives discussed which metrics to include in the tailored framework and discussed how these could be measured and reported Tailored framework with sets of metrics and ideas on how to implement M&E

CAB, community advisory board; EuroCAB, a collection of CABs participating in this European Organisation for Rare Diseases program; M&E, monitoring and evaluation.