Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 5;11(1):113. doi: 10.3390/antiox11010113

Table 1.

Individual comparisons between the four curves shown in Figure 5b. Kaplan–Meier estimates of OS according to TAC plasma levels and type of mutations (Figure S2 shows individual extended data). Differences between two survival curves was evaluated by log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Hazard ratio was computed to determine the magnitude of difference between two curves. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Significant log-rank p values (p < 0.05) are represented in bold.

Comparison Overall Survival
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p
Low TAC–JAK2 vs. High TAC–JAK2 2.487 (1.218–5.079) 0.0068
Low TAC–CALR vs. High TAC–CALR 5.240 (1.562–17.58) 0.0694
Low TAC–JAK2 vs. Low TAC–CALR 0.2756 (0.07882–0.9635) 0.1758
High TAC–JAK2 vs. High TAC–CALR 0.6290 (0.3073–1.288) 0.2132
Low TAC–JAK2 vs. High TAC–CALR 1.440 (0.6341–3.271) 0.3563
Low TAC–CALR vs. High TAC–JAK2 9.265 (3.642–23.57) 0.0076