Table 3.
Study | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Overall GRADE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baek et al. [28] | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | High risk |
Campos-Mesa et al. [29] | High risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Some concerns | High risk |
Cho & Roh [30] | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Some concerns |
Ciaccioni et al. [31] | High risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Some concerns | High risk |
Combs et al. [32] | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Some concerns |
Cromwell et al. [33] | High risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Low risk | Some concerns | High risk |
Witte et al. [34] | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Some concerns |
Youm et al. [35] | Some concerns | Low risk | Low risk | Low risk | Some concerns | Some concerns |
1: randomization process. 2: deviations from intended intervention-effects of assignment to intervention. 3: missing outcome. 4: measurement of the outcome. 5: selection of the reported result. GRADE: Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Low risk: low risk of bias. High risk: high risk of bias.