Table 4.

Bias-adjusted results from the parsimonious Cox models with combined CD${163}^{+}$ TAM marker.

Predictor	Hazard Ratio (*)	LL 95% CI	UL 95% CI	p-Value
Histological Grade 2 vs. 1	2.17	0.99	4.76	0.056
Histological Grade 3 vs. 1	2.74	1.19	6.31	0.021
HR- vs. HR+ Hormone Tx Compliant	1.52	0.77	3.01	0.233
HR+ Hormone Tx Non-Compliant vs. Compliant	2.67	1.35	5.28	0.007
Node Positive vs. Negative	1.86	1.12	3.09	0.019
Tumor Size 2–5 cm vs. <2 cm	1.75	1.02	3.00	0.046
Tumor Size >5 cm vs. <2 cm	2.81	1.48	5.33	0.002
Low vs. High Median Cancer-to-CD${163}^{+}$ NND AND Low Average Number of communicating CD${163}^{+}$ TAMs	2.29	1.14	4.63	0.024
High vs. Low Average Number of communicating CD${163}^{+}$ TAMs AND High or Low Median Cancer-to-CD${163}^{+}$ NND	2.47	1.42	4.29	0.002

(*) Bootstrap-based optimistic bias-adjusted hazard ratio.