Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;14(2):330. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020330

Table 1.

Effect of antiresorptive medication on macrophages’ activity.

Bisphosphonates Cellular Activity Polarization Protein Expression
THP1 cells (↓) viability [33,52,53]
(↓) migration [54]
(↓) phagocytosis [54]
(↑) M1
(–) M2 [55]
(↑) M1
(↓) M2 [16]
(↑) MMP9
(–) MMP2 [52]
RAW264.7 cells (↓) viability [56]
(↑) apoptosis [57]
(↓) migration [58]
(↑) IL1 [59,60]
(↑) (IL1b, IL6, TNFα,NO) [40]
BMDMs (↑) M1
(↓) M2 [16]
(↑) (IL1b, IL6, TNFα) [61]
(↑) IL1b [62]
(↑) IL6 [63]
Mouse MRONJ models (↑) M1 [16]
(↑) M1\(↓) M2 [22]
(↓) M2 [64]
(↑) (IL6, IL1b, caspase1) [60,62]
Human MRONJ tissue (↓) differentiation [34] (↑) M1
(↓) M2 [35]
(↑) M1 [65]
(↑) IL6
(↓) IL10 [35]
Denosumab/ anti-RANKL
THP1 cells (–) viability [33]
BMDMs (–) viability [66]
(–) number [67]
(–) IL10 (–)TGFb [67]
Mouse MRONJ models (↓) wound healing [66,67]
(–) differentiation [68,69]
(↓) functionality [70]
(–) M1 (–) M2 [64]
(↑) M1
(↑↑) * M2 [67]
Human MRONJ tissue (↑) M1
(↓) M2 [35]
(↑) IL6
(↓) IL10 [35]

(↑ upregulation, ↓ downregulation, – neutral); * when mAb was discontinued; BMDM, Bone marrow-derived macrophages.