. 2021 Dec 31;12(1):58. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12010058

Table 3.

The interaction effects between correct intervention guessing (i.e., sham guessed correctly or not) and stimulation condition (real vs. sham) for the outcome measures (accuracy and RTs).

Study ¹	Locus	Memory Task	Accuracy				RT
Study ¹	Locus	Memory Task	F	p	η_p²	BF₁₀	F	p	η_p²	BF₁₀
Experiment 1	Left PPC	Face–word	0.057	0.814	0.003	0.408
Experiment 2	Right PPC	Object–location	1.244	0.279	0.061	0.588
Experiment 3	Left DLPFC	Verbal 3-back	0.850	0.368	0.043	0.553	0.077	0.785	0.004	0.410
	Left DLPFC	Spatial 3-back	0.000	0.985	0.000	0.394	2.701	0.117	0.124	1.017
	Left PPC	Verbal 3-back	1.250	0.277	0.062	0.575	0.154	0.699	0.008	0.396
	Left PPC	Spatial 3-back	0.011	0.916	0.001	0.402	0.022	0.883	0.001	0.414
Experiment 4	Right DLPFC	Verbal 3-back	0.031	0.863	0.002	0.443	0.382	0.544	0.020	0.462
	Right DLPFC	Spatial 3-back	0.444	0.513	0.023	0.508	1.220	0.283	0.060	0.574
	Right PPC	Verbal 3-back	1.622	0.218	0.079	0.553	0.017	0.897	0.001	0.433
	Right PPC	Spatial 3-back	1.239	0.279	0.061	0.717	0.602	0.447	0.031	0.476

¹ The F statistic and exact p-values are presented for the interaction effects, alongside partial eta squared as a measure of effect size and BF₁₀ as a measure of relative H1/H0 odds. The main effect of sham-guess in this ANOVA model is presented in Appendix A.