Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 9;11(2):166. doi: 10.3390/foods11020166

Table 4.

Path coefficients and hypothesis testing results.

Hypothesised Relationship Coefficient T Stat p Value
H1a: Objective Apple Knowledge -> Discerning Apple Buyer −0.008 0.191 0.848
H1b: Subjective Apple Knowledge -> Discerning Apple Buyer 0.456 11.929 0.000
H2a: Gender -> Discerning Apple Buyer −0.027 0.627 0.530
H2b: Age -> Discerning Apple Buyer −0.077 1.773 0.076
H2c: Education -> Discerning Apple Buyer 0.068 1.511 0.131
H2d: Income -> Discerning Apple Buyer −0.054 1.206 0.228
H3a: Objective Apple Knowledge -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers −0.086 2.133 0.033
H3b: Subjective Apple Knowledge -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers 0.536 10.553 0.000
H4a: Gender -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers −0.006 0.129 0.898
H4b: Age -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers 0.031 0.729 0.466
H4c: Education -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers 0.126 2.134 0.033
H4d: Income -> My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers 0.005 0.140 0.889
H5: Discerning Apple Buyer -> Importance of Apple Physical Attributes 0.428 7.142 0.000
H6: My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers -> Importance of Apple Physical Attributes 0.286 4.776 0.000
H7: Discerning Apple Buyer -> Importance of Apple Commercial Attributes 0.534 9.267 0.000
H8: My Attitudes towards US Apple Growers -> Importance of Apple Commercial Attributes 0.208 3.586 0.000

Bold = p < 0.05.