Table 4.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Perceived Advantages | More-intensive in-person monitoring by HCW may increase client safety | X * | X | |
Documentation of client monitoring and TPT dispensing is easier for HCW if client is at health facility | X | X | ||
Monthly dispensing may reduce TPT stock-outs | X | X | ||
Integrated TPT/ART adherence monitoring and support from CARG leaders and peers may be more effective than monitoring and support provided by HCW | X | X | ||
The convenience of an integrated model may increase TPT uptake | X | X | ||
Perceived disadvantages |
More frequent visits increase HCW workload | X | X | |
The inconvenience of more frequent HF visits may decrease client willingness to take TPT | X | X | ||
Having to leave the support of a CARG may decrease ART adherence | X | X |
* X indicates that the issue was identified as an advantage or disadvantage of the hypothetical model by KII and/or FGD participants.