Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Retina. 2022 Feb 1;42(2):328–335. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003313

Table 1.

Differences in flow deficit measurements between the original and modified signal compensation algorithm in healthy subjects

Original Modified
Thresholding Method Parameter Mean ± SD Mean ± SD P-value
Phansalkar FD Count 938 ± 146 947 ± 190 0.709
MFDS (μm2) (†) 1565 ± 467 1272 ± 252 0.001*
FDD 0.18 ± 0.06 0.15 ± 0.06 <0.001*
MinError(I) FD Count (†) 361 ± 77 350 ± 47 0.047*
MFDS (μm2) (†) 10319 ± 2757 12152 ± 2149 0.008*
FDD (†) 0.47 ± 0.12 0.51 ± 0.01 0.215
Li FD Count 401 ± 79 365 ± 84 0.025*
MFDS (μm2) (†) 10575 ± 4000 12360 ± 5537 0.011*
FDD 0.49 ± 0.04 0.50 ± 0.03 0.049*
Phansalkar MS-SSIM 0.36 ± 0.04 0.44 ± 0.02 <0.001*
MinError(I) MS-SSIM 0.28 ± 0.06 0.39 ± 0.03 <0.001*
Li MS-SSIM 0.28 ± 0.06 0.39 ± 0.03 <0.001*

Flow deficit and similarity indices before (original) and after (modified) removing hyporeflective regions in the inverted OCT were compared using pairwise analyses. All statistical tests for P-value column were parametric two-tailed paired samples t-tests, except those labelled (†) for nonparametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test. FD = flow deficit, FDD = flow deficit density, MFDS = mean flow deficit size, MS-SSIM = multiscale structural similarity index, SD = standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (P-value of less than 0.05).