Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;15:669049. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2021.669049

Table 1.

Consecutive comparison of the Estimated Marginal Means (EMMs) of the linear mixed-effects models.

Model Tissue Contrast ΔEMM SE df P-value
Volume (mm 3 ) TIV 5–3 152.77 4.11 197.95 0.0000
11–5 180.67 9.12 57.66 0.0000
17–11 91.99 9.42 68.16 0.0000
Gray matter 5–3 49.19 2.59 391.91 0.0000
11–5 77.43 4.43 75.22 0.0000
17–11 24.52 4.82 103.13 0.0000
White matter 5–3 46.18 2.56 272.82 0.0000
11–5 31.14 5.16 64.04 0.0000
17–11 33.14 5.42 79.88 0.0000
CSF 5–3 57.39 2.81 160.56 0.0000
11–5 72.46 6.55 57.70 0.0000
17–11 34.78 6.72 65.24 0.0000
Volume/TIV (%) GM 5–3 −1.44 0.24 435.74 0.0000
11–5 −0.51 0.26 446.47 0.1274
17–11 −0.30 0.29 444.52 0.6175
WM 5–3 0.36 0.24 435.74 0.3253
11–5 −0.50 0.26 446.48 0.1377
17–11 0.40 0.29 444.52 0.3827
CSF 5–3 1.07 0.24 435.74 0.0000
11–5 1.01 0.26 446.48 0.0003
17–11 −0.10 0.29 444.52 0.9712

The difference in mm3 is reported for the volume models, while the percentage change relative to the total intracranial volume (TIV) is reported for the proportional model. ΔEMM denotes the difference in EMMs from the two sessions in the contrast column. SE, standard error. df, degrees of freedom.