Table 1.
Study | Year | Treatment | n Patients | Age (Years) | Male Sex (%) | EF (%) | Diabetes (%) | NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | Background HF Therapy | Follow-Up | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEi/ARB (%) | Beta-Blocker (%) | ARNI (%) | MRA (%) | ||||||||||
GALACTIC-HF [9] | 2021 | Omecamtiv mecarbil vs. Placebo | 8232 | 65 | 79 | 27 | 40 | 1971 | 87 * | 94 | 19 | 78 | 22 months (median) |
COSMIC-HF [22] | 2016 | Omecamtiv mecarbil vs. Placebo | 298 | 63 | 82 | 29 | 39 | 1719 | 93 | 97 | 0 | 61 | 24 weeks |
VICTORIA [8] | 2020 | Vericiguat vs. Placebo | 5050 | 67 | 76 | 29 | 47 | 2816 | 73 | 93 | 15 | 70 | 11 months (median) |
SOCRATES-REDUCED [23] | 2015 | Vericiguat vs. Placebo | 183 | 68 | 82 | 29 | 49 | 3076 | 81 | 92 | 0 | 62 | 12 weeks |
EMPEROR-Reduced [7] | 2020 | Empagliflozin vs. Placebo | 3730 | 67 | 76 | 27 | 50 | 1907 | 70 | 95 | 19 | 71 | 16 months (median) |
EMPERIAL-Reduced [24] | 2020 | Empagliflozin vs. Placebo | 311 | 70 | 74 | 30 | 60 | 1489 | 55 | 95 | 37 | 58 | 12 weeks |
Empire HF [25] | 2020 | Empagliflozin vs. Placebo | 190 | 64 | 85 | 30 | 17 | 594 | 96 * | 95 | 31 | 66 | 12 weeks |
SUGAR-DM-HF [26] | 2021 | Empagliflozin vs. Placebo | 105 | 69 | 73 | 33 | 78 | 466 | 61 | 91 | 34 | 60 | 40 weeks |
EMPA-TROPISM (ATRU-4) [27] | 2021 | Empagliflozin vs. Placebo | 84 | 62 | 64 | 36 | 0 | NA | 42 | 88 | 43 | 33 | 6 months |
DAPA-HF [6] | 2019 | Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo | 4744 | 66 | 77 | 31 | 42 | 1437 | 84 | 96 | 11 | 71 | 18 months (median) |
DECLARE-TIMI 58 (HFrEF subgroup) [20] | 2019 | Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo | 671 | 63 | 84 | 38 | 100 | NA | 88 | 88 | NA | 30 | 4.2 years (median) |
DEFINE-HF [21] | 2019 | Dapagliflozin vs. Placebo | 263 | 61 | 73 | 26 | 62 | 1136 | 59 | 97 | 33 | 61 | 12 weeks |
* ACEi, ARB, or ARNI. ACEi—angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB—angiotensin receptor blockers; ARNI—angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor; EF—ejection fraction; HF—heart failure; MRA—mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; NA—not available; NT-proBNP—N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide. This graph shows available comparisons between study treatments (with respect to the primary endpoint). The bullet diameter represents the size of the included randomized controlled trials, and line thickness represents the number of trials with direct comparisons. Direct comparisons are represented by continuous lines, while indirect comparisons are represented by dashed lines.