Table 2.

Responses to Likert statements about wearable device features and capabilities^a.

Statement			Strongly agree, n (%)		Agree, n (%)		Neutral, n (%)		Missing, n (%)
Wearability of a medical sensing device (n=180)			116 (64)		58 (33)		6 (3)		N/Ab
	Should be comfortable to wearc	17 (53)		11 (34)		2 (6)		2 (6)
	Should be compact (light and small)c	17 (53)		12 (38)		1 (3)		2 (6)
	Should be discretec	17 (53)		12 (38)		1 (3)		2 (6)
	Should be easy to attach to the bodyc	22 (69)		8 (25)		0 (0)		2 (6)
	Should not affect your normal daily routinec	21 (66)		8 (25)		1 (3)		2 (6)
	Should not detach accidentlyc	22 (69)		7 (22)		1 (3)		2 (6)
User interface (n=90)			60 (67)		30 (33)		0 (0)		N/A
	Should be rechargeablec	19 (59)		11 (34)		0 (0)		2 (6)
	Should be simple to operate (and maintain)c	20 (63)		10 (31)		0 (0)		2 (6)
	Should be accompanied by clear and readable instructions for usec	21 (66)		9 (28)		0 (0)		2 (6)
Wearer feedback (n=90)			52 (58)		37 (40)		1 (1)		N/A
	Should give instant feedback to you	17 (53)		12 (38)		1 (3)		2 (6)
	Should send alerts to the user	20 (63)		10 (31)		0 (0)		2 (6)
	Should provide you with alerts, that is, performance versus target (eg, step count)	15 (45)		15 (45)		0 (0)		3 (9)
Clinical accuracy (n=175)			143 (82)		32 (18)		0 (0)		N/A
	Should be reliable	24 (75)		6 (19)		0 (0)		2 (6)
	Should increase the accuracy of current clinical assessment	24 (75)		5 (16)		0 (0)		3 (9)
	Should reduce your requirement to travel for clinical assessment	23 (72)		6 (19)		0 (0)		3 (9)
	Should form part of your clinical assessment	24 (75)		5 (16)		0 (0)		3 (9)
	Should give you a sense of ownership of your own health care	24 (75)		5 (16)		0 (0)		3 (9)
	Should work alongside your medical care team, instead of replacing them	24 (75)		5 (16)		0 (0)		3 (9)

^aNo participant selected Disagree or Strongly Disagree for any Likert item.

^bN/A: not applicable.

^cn=30.