Table 2.
Comparison of popular mass analyzers used in plasma and serum metabolomics.
Mass Analyzer |
Resolution | Mass Range (Da) | Acquisition Speed | Major Benefits | Major Limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quadrupole | ~1000 | 50–6000 | Medium | Highly selective Well suited for pairing with GC Relatively cheap Compact |
Low resolution Narrow mass range |
Ion trap | ~1000 | 50–4000 | Medium | Compact Relatively cheap Highly sensitive |
Narrow dynamic range Limited resolution Requires pulsed introduction to MS |
FT-ICR | over 1,000,000 | 10–10,000 | Slow | High sensitivity High reproducibility High resolving power Wide dynamic range |
Expensive and bulky Slow scanning Specific coupling with chromatography systems |
Orbitrap | up to 240,000 | 40–4000 | Slow | High resolution Compact and elegant solution |
Narrow mass range |
TOF | up to 60,000 | 20–500,000 | Fast | Highly sensitive Wide mass range Fast scanning Well suited for pairing with GC |
Requires pulsed introduction to MS Requires fast solutions for data acquisition |