Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;12:795672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672

Table 2.

Model fit statistics.

Fit indices Cut-off criterion Sensitive to N Penalty for model complexity
Absolute fit indices
Chi-Square (χ2) • Lowest comparative value between measurement models Yes No
• Non-Significant Chi-Square (p > 0.01)
• Significant difference in Chi-Square between Models
• For Model Comparison: Retain Model with Lowest Chi-Square
Approximate fit indices
Root-Means-Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) • 0.06–0.08 (Marginally Acceptable); 0.01–0.05 (Excellent) No Yes
• Not-significant (p > 0.01)
• 90% Confidence Interval Range should not include Zero
• 90% Confidence Interval Range should not overlap between models
• For model comparison: Retain Model where ΔRMSEA ≤ 0.015
Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) • 0.06 to 0.08 (Marginally Acceptable); 0.01–0.05 (Excellent) Yes No
• For model comparison: Retain Model where ΔSRMR ≤ 0.015
Incremental fit indices
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) • 0.90 to 0.95 (Marginally Acceptable Fit); 0.96 to 0.99 (Excellent) No No
• For model comparison: Retain Model with Highest CFI value (ΔCFI > 0.01)
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) • 0.90 to 0.95 (Marginally Acceptable Fit); 0.96 to 0.99 (Excellent) No Yes
• For model comparison: Retain Model with Highest TLI value (ΔTLI > 0.01)
Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) • Lowest value in comparative measurement models Yes Yes
Consistent AIC (CAIC; calculated as BIC + free parameters • Lowest value in comparative measurement models Yes Yes
Bayes Information Criterion (BIC) • Lowest value in comparative measurement models Yes Yes
Sample-Size Adjusted BIC (aBIC) • Lowest value in comparative measurement models Yes Yes