Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 7;12:795672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.795672

Table 4.

Comparing CFA and ESEM models.

Model Model comparison Δχ2 Δdf ΔCFI ΔTLI ΔRMSEA ΔSRMR ΔAIC ΔBIC Differences
Model 3 Bifactor model M6 vs. M3 −596.46 27 0.056 0.061 −0.027 −0.028 −550.46 −424.01 Yes
M4/7 vs. M3 −233.96 −12 0.022 0.012 −0.004 −0.016 −209.96 −143.99 Yes
Model 4 Three first-order ESEM M6 vs. M4 −362.50 39 0.034 0.049 −0.023 −0.012 −340.50 −280.02 Yes
Model 6 Bifactor ESEM M6 vs. M7 −362.50 390 0.034 0.049 −0.023 −0.012 −340.50 −280.02 Yes
Model 7 ESEM within CFA M7 vs. M4 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 No

χ2, Chi-square; df , degrees of freedom; TLI, Tucker-Lewis Index; CFI, Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [90%CI]; SRMR, Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; AIC, Akaike Information Criterion; BIC, Bayes Information Criterion.