Table 2.
Study | Country | Procedure | VR/AR | Simulator | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Elmi-Terander et al., 2019 [90] | Sweden | Lumbar pedicle screw | VR-simulation, AR-guide | Unspecified developed system—the ARSN system | Accuracy, time, clinical outcomes |
Edström et al., 2019 [119] | Sweden | Lumbar pedicle screw | VR-simulation, AR-guide | Unspecified developed system—the ARSN system | Ratiation exposure, clinical outcomes |
Umebayashi et al., 2018 [120] |
Japan | Cervical foraminotomy | AR-guide | Medtronic StealthStation S7 | Feasibility of intraoperative use |
Kosterhon et al., 2017 [121] | Germany | Lumbar osteotomy planning | XR—volume rendered spine with VR preoperative planning and AR intraoperative workflow | Amira R, FEI Visualization Sciences Group, version 5.4.2, Mérignac Cedex, France | Feasibility of intraoperative use, clinical outcomes |
Abe et al., 2013 [122] | Japan | Lumbar percutaneous intervention | AR-guide | Unspecified developed system-Virtual Protractor with Augmented Reality (VIPAR) | Accuracy |
Wei et al., 2019 [123] | China | Lumbar percutaneous intervention | AR-guide | Baholo, Shanghai Front Computing Company, China; Medivi, Changzhou, China; Hololens, Microsoft, USA | Time (ope, radiation), clinical outcomes |
Wu et al., 2014 [124] | China | Lumbar percutaneous intervention | AR-guide | Unspecified developed system | Accuracy, time (ope, radiation) |
Carl et al., 2019 [125] | Germany | Extra- and intradural tumor resection (whole spine) | AR-guide | Unspecified developed system | Feasibility of intraoperative use |
Carl et al., 2019 [126] | Germany | Extra- and intradural tumor resection (whole spine) | AR-guide | Unspecified developed system | Accuracy, ratiation exposure |
XR, extended reality; VR, virtual reality; AR, augmented reality.