Table 5.
Pros and cons of different lipid nanoparticles production.
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Hot HPH | versatile, avoid organic solvent, easy scalability, and short production time | high temperature can cause degradation, conformational changes in protein, changes in particle size (coalescence of particles), burst release due to high emulsifiers concentration |
Cold HPH | avoid thermal exposure of the drug; good for temperature-labile drugs or hydrophilic drugs | higher Polydispersity index (PDI) |
Microemulsion | no need for specialized equipment (robust) and low energy for production | high concentrations of surfactants and co-surfactants, presence of large amounts of water in the system |
Emulsification-solvent evaporation | avoid heat during production thus useful for thermolabile drugs; simple procedure | solvent residues |
Emulsification/ultrasound/sonication | no organic solvent residue, no burst release, high lipid concentration, versatile, avoid use of organic solvent, better drug loading than HPH | metallic particle contamination, broader particle size (higher PDI) |
Emulsification-solvent diffusion | simple procedure, fast drug release (drawback when slow release is required) | low lipid content, low EE and DL, organic solvent residue, lack of scale-up |
Membrane Contactor | simple method, control of particle size by selection of process parameters (size of membrane pores) | limited scaling up possibility |