Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coefficient [95%CI] | p | Coefficient [95%CI] | p | Coefficient [95%CI] | p | |
Motor activation | −0.192 [−0.274, − 0.109] | < .001 | −0.234 [− 0.331, − 0.137] | < .001 | − 0.211 [− 0.305, − 0.117] | < .001 |
Perceptual sensitivity | 0.144 [0.079, 0.209] | < .001 | 0.157 [0.079, 0.236] | < .001 | 0.137 [0.061, 0.213] | < .001 |
Inhibitory control | 0.190 [0.115, 0.265] | < .001 | 0.110 [0.024, 0.195] | .01 | 0.091 [0.009, 0.173] | .029 |
Soothability | 0.119 [0.048, 0.189] | .001 | 0.028 [−0.055, 0.110] | .51 | 0.024 [− 0.054, 0.103] | .55 |
Attentional shifting | 0.232 [0.146, 0.317] | < .001 | 0.095 [−0.005, 0.194] | .06 | 0.087 [−0.008, 0.182] | .07 |
Low-intensity pleasure | 0.206 [0.116, 0.296] | < .001 | 0.105 [0.008, 0.202] | .034 | 0.066 [−0.026, 0.159] | .16 |
Note. Model 1 = Univariate; Model 2 = Adjusted for other subscales of the Early Child Behavior Questionnaire Subscales (ECBQ); Model 3 = Model 2 with further adjustment for child sex, birth weight, gestational age at birth, birth order, age of the mother, years of maternal education, annual household income, maternal history of mood/anxiety disorders. CI Confidence intervals. Bold types represent p < .0013. The regression coefficients shown in Table 3 indicate the amount of predicted change in the z-score of expressive language skills per one unit of change in each of the ECBQ subscales. The marginal magnitude of difference was calculated as follows: a child scoring 7 (maximum) in motor activation, for example, was predicted to score − 0.211 × 6 (i.e., 7 minus 1 point in the subscale) = − 1.266 points, corresponding to − 1.266 SD higher lower in the expressive language skill score at 40 months compared with a child scoring 1 (minimum)