Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 14;25:21.050. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.050

Table 5.

Lymph node harvest outcomes

Study Lymph node harvest (mean ± SD) p Value
Robot Lap
Baik et al,26 mean ± SD 18.4 ± 9.2 18.7 ± 12 0.831
Patriti et al,36 mean ± SD 10.3 ± 4 11.2 ± 5 > 0.05
Park et al,38 mean ± SD 17.3 ± 7.7 14.2 ± 8.9 0.060
Kwak et al,39 median (IQR) 20 (12–27) 21 (14–28) 0.702
D’Annibale et al,34 mean ± SD 16.5 ± 7.1 13.8 ± 6.7 0.053
Cho et al,31 mean ± SD 15.0 ± 8.1 16.2 ± 8.1 0.069
Park et al,37 mean ± SD 13.2 ± 7.3 15.2 ± 10.8 0.126
Kim et al,16 mean ± SD 22.3 ± 11.7 21.6 ± 11.0 0.82
Huang et al,17 mean (range) 16.7 (4–46) 15.6 (6–29) 0.49
Jayne et al,13 mean ± SD 23.2 ± 11.97 24.1 ± 12.91
Kim et al,32 mean ± SD 20.2 ± 12.1 21.0 ± 14.4 0.4410
Lim et al,18 mean ± SD 11.6 ± 6.9 14.7 ± 6.5 0.971
Crolla et al,33 median (range) 14 (2–44) 7 (0–44) Univariable p < 0.0005
Kim et al,14 median (range) 18 (7–59) 15 (4–40) 0.04
Panteleimonitis et al,40 median (IQR) 17 (13–23.35) 16 (12–23.5) 0.639
Garfinkle et al,15 mean ± SD 15.6 ± 7.6 16.6 ± 7.4 0.29

IQR = interquartile range; Lap = laparoscopic; SD = standard deviation.