Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0262161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262161

Table 3. Mediation model: Indirect effect between CRP and CRC through PE and NE.

Effect from CRP to ARB
β SE 95%CI
Total Effect 0.60** 0.02 [0.53, 0.66]
Indirect Effect 0.05** 0.01 [0.03, 0.08]
Direct Effect 0.54** 0.03 [0.47, 0.60]
Ind1: X➔W1➔Y1 0.00 0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]
Ind2: X➔W2➔Y1 0.05** 0.01 [0.03, 0.08]
Effect from CRP to SPB
Total effect 0.51** 0.03 [0.42, 0.59]
Indirect Effect 0.03* 0.01 [0.01, 0.04]
Direct Effect 0.48** 0.04 [0.40, 0.58]
Ind3: X➔W1➔Y2 0.00 0.00 [-0.01, 0.01]
Ind4: X➔W2➔Y2 0.03* 0.01 [0.01, 0.04]
Effect from CRP to ATB
Total effect -0.11** 0.03 [-0.19, -0.02]
Indirect Effect -0.03* 0.02 [-0.05, -0.01]
Direct Effect -0.08** 0.03 [-0.16, 0.03]
Ind5: X➔W1➔Y3 -0.04** 0.01 [-0.07, -0.02]
Ind6: X➔W2➔Y3 0.01 0.01 [-0.02, 0.04]

Bootstrap resample = 1000, β is a standardized coefficient, SE is a Std. Error, and CI is a confidence interval. With respect to effect sizes, standardized indirect effects around 0.01 were interpreted as small, effects ~0.09 were considered medium, and effects ~0.25 were considered large. PE = positive emotion, NE = negative emotion, ARB = Active-response behaviour, SPB = Self-protection behaviour, CRP = COVID-19-related risk perception, RTB = Risk-taking behaviour. X = CRP, W1 = NE, W2 = PE, Y1 = ARB, Y2 = SPB, Y3 = RTB, n = 1038,

**p < 0.01,

*p < 0.05 (two-tailed).