Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here's how you know

Here's how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Dec 8;127(1):255–266. doi: 10.1152/jn.00532.2020

Search in PMC
Search in PubMed
View in NLM Catalog
Add to search

Copyright © 2022 the American Physiological Society.

PMC Copyright notice

Figure 5. — Correlation analysis between AAUT and paretic arm choice for RH and LH groups in no-time, medium-, and fast-time constraint conditions. Top row shows the correlations between the paretic arm use measured by AAUT and the paretic arm choice measured by the reaching system in the no-time (A), the medium- (B), and the fast- (C) time constraint conditions in the RH group. Bottom row shows the correlations in the LH group. The RH group shows moderate-to-good correlations between clinical test and the paretic arm choice in all time conditions, whereas the LH group shows only good correlation under the fast- (F) time constraint conditions, but not under the no-time (D) or the medium- (E) time constraint conditions. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. AAUT, Amount of Arm Use Test; LH, left hemiparesis; QOM, quality of movement scale; RH, right hemiparesis.