Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 22;26(6):2099–2111. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03556-7

Table 2.

Patient participant experiences and preferences for telemedicine use during the COVID-19 pandemic

Variable Overall
IIa. Experiences with telemedicine among patients participating in a telemedicine visit during the pandemic, N = 206
Had telemedicine visit via…
 Telephone 177 (85.9%)
 Video 15 (7.3%)
 Both 14 (6.8%)
Had telemedicine visit with a…a
 HIV provider (MD, PA, APRN) 182 (66.7%)
 Specialist/Consultant 40 (14.7%)
 Pharmacist 10 (3.7%)
 Nutritionist 4 (1.5%)
 Nurse 11 (4%)
 Behavioral health (social worker, counselor) 28 (10.3%)
 Other 10 (3.7%)
Reason for telemedicine visit
 In place of a routine face to face appointment 192 (93.7%)
 For possible COVID symptoms 2 (1%)
 For other symptoms/urgent issue 11 (5.4%)
IIb. Preferences for telemedicine use among all patients, N = 273
Have any of your future medical appointments been rescheduled to telemedicine/telehealth?
 Yes 57 (21.0%)
 No 140 (51.5%)
 Don’t know 75 (27.6%)
How important is it to be able to have routine medical appointments with telemedicine/telehealth during the COVID emergency?
 Not at all important/Slightly important 61 (22.3%)
 Somewhat important 39 (14.3%)
 Important/Very important 173 (63.4%)
How important is it to be able to have urgent medical appointments with telemedicine/telehealth for symptoms (cough, fever, other) during the COVID emergency?
 Not at all important/Slightly important 52 (19.0%)
 Somewhat important 35 (12.8%)
 Important/Very important 186 (68.1%)

aParticipants were asked to check all that apply

Ten participants who indicated “other” had telehealth visits with primary care providers (n = 3), care navigators (n = 2), care coordinator (n = 1), pain medicine (n = 1), home attendant (n = 1), physical therapist (n = 1), and dentist (n = 1)