Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;12:1123. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-04426-x

Table 6.

Comparing some datasets with double-labeled Raabin-WBC.

Dataset Number of WBCs Access Staining Microscope and zoom Camera Label Ground truths
Lymp Mon Neut Eos Bas Total Nucleus Cytoplasm or whole cell
LISC20 59 55 56 42 54 266 Public Gismo-right

Axioskope40

Zoom : 100X

Sony-SSCDC50AP One expert 266 266
BCCD18 33 19 208 86 3 349 Public Gismo-right

Regular light microscope

Zoom : 100X

CCD color camera One expert
Hegde et al.39 33 23 30 22 14 122 Private Leishman

OLYMPUS CX31

Zoom : 100X

N/A One expert 122
MISP19 36 33 38 42 0 149 Public N/A

Canon optical microscope

Zoom : 100X

Canon V1 One expert
ALL-IDB17 60 3 18 2 1 84 Public N/A

N/A

Zoom : 300X–500X

Canon PowerShot G5 N/A

Zheng et al.21

(CellaVision)

37 18 30 12 3 100 Public N/A

N/A

Zoom : N/A

N/A One expert 100 100
Zheng et al.21 53 48 176 22 1 300 Public A newly developed method21

N800-D motorized autofocus

Zoom : N/A

Motic moticam pro 252A One expert 300 300
Double-labeled Raabin-WBC 3609 795 10,862 1066 301 17,965 public Giemsa

1. Olympus Cx18

2. Zeiss microscope

Zoom : 100

1.Camera phone Samsung galaxy S5

2.Camera phone LG G3

Two experts 1145 1145

Double-labeled Raabin-WBC does not contain the repeated samples as well as includes only five general cells (lymphocyte, monocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil).