Table 3.
The comparison of the activity of MOF-PIL-AM for the model Knoevenagel condensation reaction with some reported catalysts45–50.
| Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Time (h:min) | Temp. °C | Recycle run | Yield (%) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOF-PIL-AM | H2O(US) | 00:05 | 25 | 5 | 100 | This work |
| 2 | BC@GCN-P-IL a | H2O | 2:00 | 25 | 5 | 100 | 51 |
| 3 | Activated Hf-UiO-66-N2H3 | EtOH | 4:00 | 25 | 5 | 98 | 47 |
| 4 | Glycine | [6-mim] PF6 | 22:00 | 25 | 2 | 77 | 45 |
| 5 | [H3N+-CH2-CH2-OH][CH3COO-]IL | Solvent free | < 1:00 | 25 | 5 | 90.9 | 48 |
| 6 | Caffein-SiO2@Fe3O4 | H2O (US) | 00:06 | 60 | 5 | 94 | 46 |
| 7 | [Zn2(TCA)(BIB)2,5]. (NO3)b | Solvent free | 1:00 | 60 | 4 | > 99 | 50 |
| 8 | PdNi@GO | H2O/EtOH | 00:08 | 25 | 5 | 95 | 49 |
a: Biochar-Based Graphitic Carbon Nitride Adorned with Ionic Liquid Containing Acidic Polymer.
b:[Zn2(tricarboxytriphenyl amine)(1,3(imidazol-1-ylmethyl)benzene)2,5].(NO3).
US: Ultrasonic irradiation.