Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 21;12:1107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05145-7

Table 3.

One-sided permutation p-values based on a studentized Wilcoxon rank-sum statistic56 of the global null hypothesis that the intervention (CE vs. control) had no effect on ALFF changes during the experiment (see Supplementary Information, for indexed box charts). p-values have been adjusted for multiple comparisons using a closed testing procedure (FWE-correction)57. Fisher’s chi-square combining function55 was used to summarize evidence over the partial tests (last column). Effect sizes for between-group comparisons at all time intervals are reported as Cliff’s delta (d)58 with the related 95% CI. The magnitude of d can be interpreted using the following thresholds: |d|< 0.147 "negligible", |d|< 0.33 "small", |d|< 0.474 "medium", otherwise "large"59.

MRI_1–MRI_2 MRI_1–MRI_3 MRI_1–MRI_4 MRI_1–MRI_5 NPC

FA_cluster04

18, − 63, 44

p = 0.17, d = 0.25, 95% CI [− 0.18, 0.60] p = 0.076, d = 0.33, 95% CI [− 0.09, 0.65] p = 0.029, d = 0.55, 95% CI [0.12, 0.81] p = 0.29, d = 0.13, 95% CI [− 0.31, 0.53] p = 0.017

FA_cluster03

30, − 62, 41

p = 0.18, d = 0.21, 95% CI [− 0.24, 0.58] p = 0.1, d = 0.28, 95% CI [− 0.15, 0.61] p = 0.014, d = 0.61, 95% CI [0.20, 0.84] p = 0.093, d = 0.3, 95% CI [− 0.14, 0.64] p = 0.009

FA_cluster02

38, − 60, 36

p = 0.2, d = 0.19, 95% CI [− 0.25, 0.57] p = 0.14, d = 0.26, 95% CI [− 0.17, 0.60] p = 0.036, d = 0.53, 95% CI [0.11, 0.79] p = 0.086, d = 0.33, 95% CI [− 0.10, 0.66] p = 0.021

FA_cluster01

24, − 59, 45

p = 0.15, d = 0.23, 95% CI [− 0.21, 0.60] p = 0.053, d = 0.38, 95% CI [− 0.05, 0.68] p = 0.013, d = 0.54, 95% CI [0.11, 0.80] p = 0.2, d = 0.19, 95% CI [− 0.24, 0.56] p = 0.004

λ_cluster07

41, − 18, 34

p = 0.027, d = 0.46, 95% CI [0.03, 0.74] p = 0.046, d = 0.36, 95% CI [− 0.06, 0.67] p = 0.04, d = 0.42, 95% CI [− 0.01, 0.72] p = 0.12, d = 0.25, 95% CI [− 0.19, 0.61] p = 0.017

λ_cluster06

39, − 7, 30

p = 0.039, d = 0.43, 95% CI [− 0.01, 0.73] p = 0.036, d = 0.42, 95% CI [0, 0.71] p = 0.027, d = 0.48, 95% CI [0.06, 0.76] p = 0.15, d = 0.23, 95% CI [− 0.21, 0.60] p = 0.012

λ_cluster05

35, − 19, 35

p = 0.058, d = 0.43, 95% CI [− 0.01, 0.73] p = 0.062, d = 0.36, 95% CI [− 0.06, 0.67] p = 0.052, d = 0.41, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.71] p = 0.19, d = 0.19, 95% CI [− 0.24, 0.56] p = 0.028

λ_cluster04

49, 1, 26

p = 0.037, d = 0.43, 95% CI [− 0, 0.73] p = 0.022, d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.05, 0.74] p = 0.058, d = 0.43, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.73] p = 0.18, d = 0.19, 95% CI [− 0.24, 0.56] p = 0.01

λ_cluster03

44, − 21, 35

p = 0.02, d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.04, 0.75] p = 0.046, d = 0.36, 95% CI [− 0.06, 0.67] p = 0.045, d = 0.43, 95% CI [− 0.01, 0.72] p = 0.13, d = 0.25, 95% CI [− 0.19, 0.60] p = 0.016

λ_cluster02

49, − 5, 20

p = 0.047, d = 0.4, 95% CI [− 0.04, 0.71] p = 0.019, d = 0.48, 95% CI [0.06, 0.75] p = 0.021, d = 0.49, 95% CI [0.05, 0.77] p = 0.15, d = 0.23, 95% CI [− 0.20, 0.59] p = 0.008

λ_cluster01

53, 3, 26

p = 0.034, d = 0.45, 95% CI [0.02, 0.74] p = 0.025, d = 0.48, 95% CI [0.06, 0.75] p = 0.056, d = 0.44, 95% CI [− 0.01, 0.74] p = 0.19, d = 0.18, 95% CI [− 0.24, 0.55] p = 0.009