Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;13(3):759–788. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.11.007

Table 3.

Diameter, Circumference, and Areas of LDs Evaluated by TEM Analysis and Stratified According to the Genetic Background of the HepG2 Cells

Diameter ANOVA Student t test P valuea
Cas9+ 0.38 {0.33–0.43} <0.0001
MBOAT7-/- 2.88 {2.59–3.18} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001
TM6SF2-/- 1.05 {0.91–1.16} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001
MBOAT7-/-TM6SF2-/- 2.42 {2.04–2.72} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001

Circumference, μm
Cas9+ 1.19 {1.05–1.35} <0.0001
MBOAT7-/- 9.09 {8.13–10.0} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001
TM6SF2-/- 3.31 {2.87–3.65} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001
MBOAT7-/-TM6SF2-/- 7.60 {6.42–8.55} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001

Area, μm2
Cas9+ 0.11 {0.09–0.14} <0.0001
MBOAT7-/- 6.51 {5.26–7.98} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001
TM6SF2-/- 0.87 {0.65–1.06} <0.0001 0.003 <.0001
MBOAT7-/-TM6SF2-/- 4.60 {3.28–5.82} <0.0001 <0.0001 <.0001

NOTE. Values are reported as median {interquartile range}.

a

Bold P values are adjusted at post hoc Dunn's multiple comparison test and compared with the Cas9+ control group.