Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;36(1):171–178. doi: 10.1111/jvim.16327

TABLE 3.

Sensitivity and specificity of the combined calls from the 6 observers on 40 lesions with histologic diagnoses (n = 240 calls)

(a) Intradural/extramedullary lesions
Test result
IDEM diagnosed IDEM not diagnosed
Histological IDEM 67 41
Non‐IDEM 5 127
Value 95% CI
Sensitivity 62.0% 52.2–71.2
Specificity 96.2% 91.4‐98.8
Positive likelihood ratio 16.4 6.9‐39.2
Negative likelihood ratio 0.39 0.31‐0.50
Disease prevalence 45.0% 38.6‐51.5
Positive predictive value a 93.1% 84.8‐97.0
Negative predictive value a 75.6% 70.8‐79.8
Accuracy a 80.8% 75.3‐85.6
(b) Intramedullary lesions
Test result
IM diagnosed IM not diagnosed
Histological IM 35 7
Non‐IM 42 156
Value 95% CI
Sensitivity 83.3% 68.6‐93.0
Specificity 78.8% 72.4‐84.3
Positive likelihood ratio 3.93 2.9‐5.31
Negative likelihood ratio 0.21 0.11‐0.42
Disease prevalence 17.5% 12.9‐22.9
Positive predictive value a 45.5% 38.2‐53.0
Negative predictive value a 95.7% 91.9‐97.8
Accuracy a 79.6% 73.9‐84.5
(c) Degenerative myelopathy
Test result
DM diagnosed DM not diagnosed
Histological DM 78 12
Non‐DM 13 137
Value 95% CI
Sensitivity 86.7% 77.9‐92.9
Specificity 91.3% 85.6‐95.3
Positive likelihood ratio 10.00 5.91‐16.92
Negative likelihood ratio 0.15 0.09‐0.25
Disease prevalence 37.5% 31.3‐44.0
Positive predictive value a 85.7% 78.0‐91.0
Negative predictive value a 92.0% 87.1‐95.1
Accuracy a 89.6% 85.0‐93.1

Abbreviations: DM, degenerative myelopathy; IDEM, intradural‐extramedullary; IM, intramedullary.

a

Indicates the value is dependent upon disease prevalence in a study population.