TABLE 5.
Comparison of ROC curve analysis of RC and other non‐conventional lipid parameters for the prediction of arterial stiffness
| Variables | AUC | 95% CI | P value | Z value | P for comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RC | 0.629 | 0.597–0.661 | < .001 | Reference | Reference |
| Non‐HDL‑C | 0.589 | 0.556–0.621 | < .001 | 2.137 | .033 |
| AIP | 0.589 | 0.556–0.621 | < .001 | 2.505 | .012 |
| LCI | 0.600 | 0.568–0.632 | < .001 | 1.795 | .073 |
| AI | 0.579 | 0.546–0.611 | < .001 | 2.661 | .008 |
| TG/HDL‑C | 0.589 | 0.556–0.621 | < .001 | 2.513 | .012 |
| CRI‐I | 0.579 | 0.546–0.611 | < .001 | 2.661 | .008 |
| CRI‐II | 0.560 | 0.527–0.593 | .002 | 3.114 | .002 |
Abbreviations: RC, remnant cholesterol; AIP, atherogenic index of plasma; LCI, lipoprotein combine index; AI, atherosclerosis index; TG, triglycerides; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRI‐I, Castelli's risk index I; CRI‐II, Castelli's risk index II; AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval.