Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Endoscopy. 2021 Jan 27;54(1):52–61. doi: 10.1055/a-1376-2394

Table 2.

Variation in techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-directed transgastric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (EDGE).

Author (year) Patients, n Procedure time, minutes Access type Method for stomach insufflation Size of LAMS, mm Cautery/non-cautery Single/delayed Time to ERCP, days Hospital stay, days Fistula closure
GG/JG
Amateau et al. (2018) 3 Single session 53±22; delayed NA 2/1 Not reported 15 0/3 3/0 0 1 NA
Bukhari et al. (2018) 30 Single session 49±26; delayed NA 17/13 5–10 mL contrast & 120–300 mL sterile water 15 14/16 8/22 21.5 1 7 OTS clips, 8 OTS suturing device, 15 spontaneous
James et al. (2019) 19 All patients 116±88 8/11 Saline + contrast solution 15 14/5 4/15 48 NA 6 spontaneous, 13 APC
Kedia et al. (2019) 29 All patients 73 (24–230) NA 120 mL water + contrast 15 NA 3/26 21–28 0.8 OTS suturing
Wang et al. (2019) 9 All patients 142±37 3/6 > 200mL contrast 50:50 dilution 15 9/0 7/2 14–21 NA Double-pigtail stent placement
de Benito Sanz et al. (2020) 14 NA 9/5 >100mL of water-soluble contrast + sterile water 20 10/4 10/4 22 NA 5 double-pigtail, 1 OTS clip, 1 OTS clip & pigtail
Kochhar et al. (2020) 26 All patients 79±31 22/4 Mixture of contrast + saline 15 (×24) 20 (× 2) 26/0 13/13 NA 1.6 18 spontaneous, 3 surgically, 3 endoscopic clips
Krafft et al. (2020) 21 NA 13/8 >100mL of contrast + sterile water 20 21/0 11/10 2 NA NA
Tyberg et al. (2020) 18 All patients 54.5 (31–88)* NA Contrast + 120 mL water 15 NA 5/13 14–21 NA OTS clip and/or endoscopic sutures

GG, gastrogastrostomy; JG, jejunogastrostomy; LAMS, lumen-apposing metal stent; ERCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; OTS, over the scope; APC, argon plasma coagulation; NA, not available.

*

Includes one patient who only underwent endoscopic ultrasound.