Table 2.
Factors associated with increased tobacco use among smokers (logistic regression model, n = 159)
| Univariable analyses | Multivariable analysis, n = 159 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) or median [IQR] | OR | RSE | 95% CI LL | 95% CI UL | p | aOR | RSE | 95% CI LL | 95% CI UL | p | |
| Gender | |||||||||||
| Male | 35 (22.0) | 1 | |||||||||
| Female | 124 (78.0) | 1.65 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 3.55 | 0.198 | |||||
| Age (years) | |||||||||||
| 18–30 | 24 (15.1) | 1 | 0.082 | ||||||||
| 31–40 | 60 (37.7) | 0.61 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 1.65 | 0.331 | |||||
| 41–50 | 37 (23.3) | 0.27 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.019 | |||||
| 51 + | 38 (23.9) | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 1.18 | 0.096 | |||||
| Profession | |||||||||||
| Administration | 38 (23.9) | 1 | 0.921 | ||||||||
| Engineering, logistics, and technical functions | 27 (17.0) | 0.72 | 0.37 | 0.27 | 1.95 | 0.517 | |||||
| Physician | 21 (13.2) | 0.82 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 2.39 | 0.713 | |||||
| Direct contact profession other than physicians | 73 (45.9) | 0.93 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 2.03 | 0.846 | |||||
| Type of housing | |||||||||||
| Apartment | 117 (73.6) | 1 | |||||||||
| House | 42 (26.4) | 0.53 | 0.19 | 0.26 | 1.09 | 0.083 | |||||
| Living alone | |||||||||||
| No | 128 (80.5) | 1 | |||||||||
| Yes | 31 (19.5) | 2.13 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 4.81 | 0.070 | |||||
| History of depression | |||||||||||
| No | 149 (93.7) | 1 | |||||||||
| Yes | 10 (6.3) | 1.01 | 0.66 | 0.28 | 3.66 | 0.984 | |||||
| Change in physical activity | |||||||||||
| No decrease | 116 (73.0) | 1 | |||||||||
| Decrease | 43 (27.0) | 1.82 | 0.66 | 0.89 | 3.71 | 0.101 | |||||
| COVID-19-related drop in income | |||||||||||
| No | 123 (77.4) | 1 | |||||||||
| Yes | 36 (22.6) | 0.66 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 1.40 | 0.277 | |||||
| MAAS score | 3.8 [3.13–4.67] | 0.65 | 0.11 | 0.47 | 0.90 | 0.010 | 0.71 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 0.99 | 0.046 |
| Affect deterioration1 | 3 [1–4] | 1.46 | 0.15 | 1.19 | 1.78 | < 10–3 | 1.41 | 0.15 | 1.15 | 1.73 | 0.001 |
| Alcohol use | |||||||||||
| No | 51 (32.1) | 1 | |||||||||
| Yes | 108 (67.9) | 1.66 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 3.26 | 0.143 | |||||
| Pre-lockdown nicotine dependence score2 (n = 129) | 3 [1–4] | 0.86 | 0.07 | 0.73 | 1.02 | 0.075 | |||||
1Five dichotomous indicators were combined into a composite variable: changes in sleep quality, stress, irritability, motivation, and sadness (1: deterioration, 0: no deterioration)
2Fagerström Nicotine Dependence score
aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; LL, lower limit; MAAS, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale; RSE, robust standard error; UL, upper limit