Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;142(2):343–353. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04101-w

Table 3.

Postoperative radiologic results of each patient

Patient Sex Age (years) Follow-up (months) Cemented Lucencies Amount of subsidence (mm) Signs of OA at the radiocarpal joint Signs of OA at the distal radioulnar joint
1 f 66 12 No No 0 n.a.a No
2 f 75 12 Yes No 0 Sclerotic signs scaphoid Erosions
3 f 65 17 Yes No 0 n.a.a n.a.b
4 f 73 19 No Around the shell 7.5 n.a.a no
5 f 75 24 Yes No 0 n.a.a n.a.b
6 f 87 29 Yes No 0 Sclerotic signs scaphoid no
7 f 71 31 Yes No 0 Radioscaphoidal synostosis n.a.b
8 f 68 33 Yes No 0 Sclerotic signs scaphoid no
9 f 74 40 No No 0 Triquetral erosions Grade Ic
10 f 66 42 No Around the stem 0 n.a.a n.a.b
11 f 76 54 No No 0 Scaphoid erosions Grade II–IIIc
12 f 80 54 No No 4.5 n.a.a Erosions
13 m 80 38 Yes No 0 n.a.a No

OA osteoarthritis; n.a. not applicable

aDue to implant-related overlaps in the X-ray

bAfter Kapandji or Darrach procedure

cAccording to the Kellgren-Lawrence Classification