Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 2;61(1):447–459. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02656-3

Table 3.

Participants’ general characteristics of the intervention study (n = 46)

Vitamin C Placebo P value
Total Men Women Total Men Women
No. of subjects 24 14 10 22 12 10 0.79
Age (year) 24.6 ± 3.5 24.9 ± 3.6 24.1 ± 3.5 23.7 ± 1.9 24.0 ± 2.0 23.3 ± 1.8 0.27
BMI (kg/m2) 22.6 ± 3.0 24.2 ± 2.6 20.3 ± 1.9 22.3 ± 3.3 23.5 ± 2.0 20.8 ± 4.1 0.74
Occupation 0.89
 Undergraduate student (n) 17 10 7 17 9 8
 Graduate student (n) 3 2 1 3 2 1
 Employee (n) 4 2 2 2 1 1
Current smoker (n) 1 1 0 3 2 1 0.60
Dietary supplement user (n) 3 3 0 2 2 0  > 0.99
 Protein 2 2 0 1 1 0
 Vitamin D 1 1 0 1 1 0
Physical activity (MET-min/week) 2057 ± 1369 2219 ± 1205 1831 ± 1612 1889 ± 1379 2022 ± 1354 1730 ± 1465 0.68
Serum vitamin C concentration (μmol/L) 42.5 ± 11.7 41.5 ± 12.7 43.9 ± 10.6 40.2 ± 17.2 35.0 ± 10.8 46.4 ± 21.6 0.59
Daily vitamin C intake (mg/day) 41.3 ± 43.8 53.2 ± 14.0 24.7 ± 17.0 52.5 ± 57.8 48.1 ± 43.6 57.8 ± 73.6 0.46

Values are mean ± SD or categorical total

P values were obtained by comparing the vitamin C group (n = 24) with the placebo group (n = 22) using an unpaired t test, a Pearson’s Chi-square test, or a Fisher’s exact test