Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Genet Couns. 2021 Jul 23;31(1):230–241. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1476

Table 2.

CHARM quantitative data

Domain Values non-LGBTQ+ CHARM Participants N=668 LGBTQ+ CHARM Participants N=133 Interviewed CHARM Participants N=20
Eligibility for study Positive screen on RAT 537 (80.4%) 101 (75.9%) 12 (60.0%)
Limited family history knowledge 131 (19.6%) 32 (24.1%) 8 (40.0%)

Family relationships a Healthy family relationships 521 (81.2%) 86 (63.8%) 9 (45.0%)
Unhealthy family relationships 121 (18.9%) 47 (36.2%) 11 (55.0%)

Family communication Communicated study result with:
At least 1 family member 331/407 (81.3%) 68/80 (85.0%) 11/16 (68.7%)
Parent 260/294 (88.4%) 56/63 (88.9%) 10/11 (90.9%)
Sibling 233/298 (78.2%) 41/56 (73.2%) 7/9 (77.8%)
Children 135/206 (65.5%) 10/15 (40.0%) 0/5 (0.0%)

Provider communication Yes 94 (23.2%) 16 (19.8%) 3/17 (17.7%)
Not yet, but I plan to 199 (49.0%) 40 (49.4%) 7/17 (41.2%)
No, and I don’t plan to 113 (27.8%) 25 (30.9%) 1/17 (41.2%)
a

Family relationship scores missing for 32 participants

RAT = Risk assessment tool