Table 4.
Significance of paths (total and indirect effect) and relative importance of indirect path
| Paths | b (S.E.) |
|---|---|
| Total effect | |
| FE → FL + FA → FB → EH | − 0.058 (0.005)*** |
| FS → FL + FA → FB → EH | − 0.091 (0.005)*** |
| Indirect effect | |
| FE → FL → FB → EH | − 0.023 (0.002)*** |
| FE → FA → FB → EH | − 0.034 (0.004)*** |
| FS → FL → FB → EH | − 0.020 (0.002)*** |
| FS → FA → FB → EH | − 0.071 (0.005)*** |
| Relative importance of indirect path | (%) |
|---|---|
| FE → FL + FA → FB → EH | 100.0 |
| FE → FL → FF → EH | 39.6 |
| FE → FA → FF → EH | 60.4 |
| FS → FL + FA → FB → EH | 100.0 |
| FS → FL → FB → EH | 21.9 |
| FS → FA → FB → EH | 78.1 |
FE financial education, FS financial socialization, FL financial literacy, FA financial access, FB financial behavior, EH economic hardship
***p < .001