Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 23;24:2. doi: 10.1186/s12575-021-00163-7

Table 1.

Comparison of Classified platforms incorporating CRISPR/Cas effectors

Classifications Effector System Recognition
type
Sensitivity Specificity Signal
amplification
Quantitative Multiplex Time Readout Infrastructure
requirement
Reference
Cas9-based class Sp-dCas9 RCH dsDNA fM 1 nt RCA Ya Na < 4 h TMB substantial [22]
PC reporter dsDNA One copy NA PCR N N 10 mins* Luciferase Few [23]
Cas13-based class

CcaCas13b

PsmCas13b

LwaCas13a

SHERLOCKv2f dsDNA/Virus RNA aM 1 nt RPA Y Y 2 ~  5 h Fluorescence Substantial [15]
Cas12-based class LbCas12a DETECTR HPV aM 1 nt RPA N N ~ 1 h fluorescence substantial [24]
LbCas12a Cas12aVDet Mycoplasma aM 1 nt RPA N N ~ 30 min Naked eye Few [25]
LbCas12a DETECTR-COVID19 SARS-CoV-2 95% 1 nt RT-LAMP N N ~ 45 min LFA Few [19]
Cas14-based class Cas14a1 Cas14-DETECTR ssDNA NA 1 nt PTAa N N NA fluorescence substantial [26]

aAll features were claimed by the original publications; Y: yes; N: no; PTA: phosphorothioate amplification; NA: uncertainty;

* shown 10 mins after PCR