Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 23;24:2. doi: 10.1186/s12575-021-00163-7

Table 3.

Comparison of major platforms incorporating CRISPR/Cas 12

System name Effector Recognition
type
Sensitivity Specificity Signal
amplification
Quantitative Multiplex Time Readout Infrastructure
requirement
Reference
CaT-SMelor LbCas12a Small molecule nM Single molecule N Y N 40 min Fluorescence Substantial [59]
OCTOPUS LbCas12a dsDNA One copy 1 nt RPA Y N 50 min Fluorescence Substantial [60]
CORDS LbCas12a ASFV aM 1 nt RAA N N ~ 1 h LFA Few [61]
Cas12aVDet LbCas12a Mycoplasma aM 1 nt RPA N N ~ 30 min Naked eye Few [25]
CDetection AaCas12b HPV aM 1 nt RPA N N ~ 2.5 h Fluorescence Substantial [62]
CRISPR-MTB LbCas12a TB 98% 1 nt RPA N N / Fluorescence Substantial [63]
DETECTR-COVID19 LbCas12a SARS-CoV-2 95% 1 nt RT-LAMP N N ~ 45 min LFA Few [19]

CaT-SMelor: CRISPR-Cas12a- and aTF-mediated small molecule detector. OCTOPUS: One-pot toolbox with precision and ultrasensitivity; higher sensitivity than general qPCR; LFA: Lateral flow assay; ASFV: African swine fever virus; CORDS: Cas12a-based on-site and rapid detection system; Cas12aVDet: Cas12a-based visual detection; CRISPR-MTB: Clinic test; CDetection: Cas12b-mediated DNA detection; DETECTR: CRISPR trans reporter