TABLE 2.
Regression analysis of variables in the model.
Equation | Fit index |
95%CI |
||||||
Outcome variable | Predictive variable | R 2 | F | β | Lower limit | Upper limit | t | p |
IAT | TAS | 0.31 | 161.08 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.92 | 12.69 | < 0.000 |
TAS | CC | 0.31 | 155.64 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 12.48 | < 0.000 |
POS | 0.09 | 34.77 | –0.30 | –0.11 | –0.06 | –5.90 | < 0.000 | |
CSC | 0.10 | 40.54 | –0.32 | –0.09 | –0.05 | –6.37 | < 0.000 | |
NEG | 0.32 | 166.20 | –0.57 | –0.18 | –0.14 | –12.89 | < 0.000 | |
NC | 0.31 | 160.31 | –0.56 | –0.19 | –0.14 | –12.66 | < 0.000 | |
TAS | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.53 | 4.50 | < 0.000 | |||
CC | 0.14 | 0.23 | 1.25 | 2.86 | < 0.000 | |||
POS | –0.10 | –0.93 | –0.04 | –2.13 | 0.03 | |||
CSC | IAT | 0.42 | 41.56 | –0.02 | –0.76 | 0.44 | –0.52 | 0.60 |
NEG | –0.08 | –0.96 | 0.17 | –1.38 | 0.17 | |||
NC | –0.25 | –1.71 | –0.64 | –4.32 | < 0.000 |
CC, cognitive confidence; POS, positive beliefs about worry; CSC, cognitive self-consciousness; NEG, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry; NC, need to control thoughts; TAS, Toronto Alexithymia Scale; IAT, Internet addiction test.