TABLE 3.
Total effect, direct effect, and indirect effect analysis of alexithymia and metacognition with its dimensions.
Effect | Boot SE | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | Relative effect (%) | |
Total effect | 0.79 | 0.06 | 0.67 | 0.92 | |
Direct effect | 0.37 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.53 | 0.47 |
Total indirect effect | 0.42 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.53 |
Indirect effect of CC | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.14 |
Indirect effect of POS | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.05 |
Indirect effect of CSC | 0.01 | 0.02 | –0.03 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
Indirect effect of NEG | 0.06 | 0.05 | –0.04 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
Indirect effect of NC | 0.20 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.29 | 0.25 |
Comparison 1 | 0.05 | 0.04 | –0.03 | 0.12 | |
Comparison 2 | –0.06 | 0.05 | –0.15 | 0.03 | |
Comparison 3 | –0.11 | 0.04 | –0.18 | –0.03 |
CC, cognitive confidence; POS, positive beliefs about worry; CSC, cognitive self-consciousness; NEG, negative beliefs about uncontrollability and danger of worry; NC, need to control thoughts; Comparison 1, indirect effect of CC minus indirect effect of POS; Comparison 2, indirect effect of CC minus indirect effect of NC; Comparison 3, negative indirect effect of POS minus indirect effect of NC.