Table 3.
CFA using WLSMV
| Model tested | Sample | Fit indices | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X2 | P* | df | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (LO90, HI90) |
SRMSR | ||
| EFA 3 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–10) | High risk A | 36.87 | 0.045 | 24 | 0.986 | 0.979 | 0.058 (0.009–0.094) | 0.053 |
| AH (1), AX (3,4,5), D (7–8) | Community A | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (8,9) | Community P | 20.73 | 0.036 | 11 | 0.995 | 0.991 | 0.048 (0.012–0.080) | 0.032 |
| EFA 2 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2), D(3, 5–10) | High risk A | 39.59 | 0.043 | 26 | 0.984 | 0.978 | 0.057 (0.011-0.092) | 0.054 |
| AH (1,2,7,8), D (3,4,5,9) | Community A | 63.21 | < 0.001 | 19 | 0.968 | 0.953 | 0.091 (0.067–0.116) | .0.059 |
| D (1,2, 7–9), AX (3,4,5) | Community P | 61.93 | < 0.001 | 19 | 0.982 | 0.973 | 0.077 (0.056–0.099) | 0.049 |
| One factor | High risk A | 141.94 | < 0.001 | 45 | 0.897 | 0.867 | 0.139 (0.115–0.163) | 0.093 |
| Community A | 75.17 | < 0.001 | 27 | 0.987 | 0.983 | 0.080 (0.059–0.101) | 0.062 | |
| Community P | 198.5 | < 0.001 | 27 | 0.936 | 0.915 | 0.129 (0.113–0.146) | 0.077 | |
| Phillips 2 factors | ||||||||
| D (1,2,6–10), AX (3,4,5), same as EFA | High risk A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| D (1,2,6–9), AX (3,4,5) | Community A | 42.56 | 0.021 | 26 | 0.996 | 0.994 | 0.048 (0.018–0.072) | 0.045 |
| D (1,2, 6–9), AX (3,4,5) | Community P | 82.58 | < 0.001 | 26 | 0.975 | 0.966 | 0.076 (0.058–0.094) | 0.049 |
| Zhong 2 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2), D (3–10) | High risk A | 121.66 | < 0.001 | 34 | 0.915 | 0.888 | 0.127 (0.103–0.152) | 0.085 |
| AH (1,2), D (3–9) | Community A | 69.06 | 0.001 | 26 | 0.989 | 0.984 | 0.077 (0.055–0.099) | 0.057 |
| AH (1,2), D (3–9) | Community P | 160.6 | < 0.001 | 26 | 0.942 | 0.919 | 0.117 (0.100–0.134) | 0.066 |
| Brouwers 2–3 factors | ||||||||
| D (1,2,8), AX (3,4,5), SH (10) | High risk A | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ | ^ |
| D (1,2,8), AX (3,4,5) | Community A | 12.43 | 0.133 | 8 | 0.997 | 0.994 | 0.044 (0.000–0.090) | 0.042 |
| D (1,2,8), AX (3,4,5) | Community P | 33.56 | < 0.001 | 8 | 0.982 | 0.966 | 0.092 (0.061–0.125) | 0.051 |
| Lau 3 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (6–10) | High risk A | 51.76 | 0.015 | 32 | 0.981 | 0.973 | 0.062 (0.028–0.092) | 0.058 |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (6–9) | Community A | 36.07 | 0.054 | 24 | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.042 (0.000–0.069) | 0.038 |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (6–9) | Community P | 41.73 | 0.014 | 24 | 0.992 | 0.988 | 0.044 (0.020–0.066) | 0.035 |
| Tuohy 3 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2),AX (3,4,5),D (7–10), same as EFA | High risk A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–9) | Community A | 26.63 | 0.064 | 17 | 0.997 | 0.995 | 0.045 (0.000–0.076) | 0.039 |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–9) | Community P | 27.14 | 0.056 | 17 | 0.996 | 0.993 | 0.040 (0.000–0.066) | 0.033 |
| Kubota 3 factors | ||||||||
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–9) | High risk A | 30.21 | 0.025 | 17 | 0.984 | 0.974 | 0.070 (0.025–0.110) | 0.050 |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–9) Tuohy | Community A | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| AH (1,2), AX (3,4,5), D (7–9) Tuohy | Community P | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
*is sensitive to sample size, and can be significant for large samples, ^ model is not identified, A antenatal/prenatal, P postnatal, D depression, AX anxiety, AH anhedonia, SH self-harm, SRMSR Standardised Root Mean Square Residual. < less than.