TABLE 7.
The difference of path coefficients between WeChat Pay’s and Kakao Pay’s different consumers.
Hypothesis | Route | WeChat Pay |
Kakao Pay |
Pairwise parameter comparisons |
|||
β | P | β | P | T value | p-Value | ||
H6b | IT → UI | 0.057 | 0.177 | 0.509 | *** | 7.854 | 0.000 |
H4b | US → UI | 0.351 | *** | 0.061 | 0.241 | –2.879 | 0.004 |
H7 | PE → UI | 0.291 | *** | 0.050 | 0.393 | –2.704 | 0.007 |
H8 | EE → UI | 0.020 | 0.593 | 0.040 | 0.292 | 0.564 | 0.573 |
H9 | SI → UI | 0.189 | *** | 0.213 | *** | 1.470 | 0.142 |
H10 | FC → UI | 0.107 | 0.008* | 0.278 | *** | 3.106 | 0.002 |
H11 | HM → UI | 0.269 | *** | 0.099 | 0.010* | –2.536 | 0.012 |
H12 | PV → UI | 0.079 | 0.032* | 0.330 | *** | 5.193 | 0.000 |
H13 | HA → UI | 0.285 | *** | 0.097 | 0.010* | –2.951 | 0.003 |
*p-value < 0.05 and ***p-value < 0.001.