Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 10;8:769555. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.769555

Figure 9.

Figure 9

(A) The effects of SCE treated with varying concentrations on cell proliferation was detected by CCK-8 assay. The data in control group was set as “1.” Ordinary one-way ANOVA was taken to analyzed multiple comparisons. (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, compared with control group). (B) The production of NO on LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (****p < 0.0001 vs. control, #p <0.05 vs. LPS). (C) The production of IFN-γ on LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. control, ###p < 0.001 vs. LPS). (D) The production of PGE2 on LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells (#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001, ####p < 0.0001 vs. LPS). (E) The expression of COX-2 was evaluated by western blot and analyzed by Image J. (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. LPS). (F) The cell morphology observation after LPS-stimulation and 24-h administration under a bright field microscope (400× magnification). All data were statistically performed by ordinary one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons test and no less than three independent experiments.