Table 4.
Overview of the mental fatigue on basketball performance.
| Study | Sample | Basketball task | Time | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Englert et al. (2015) | 31 M | 30 FT | Post CT | FT accuracy ↓ I vs. C; |
| López et al. (2017) | 18 | 30 FT | Post CT | Percentage of FT ↓ I vs. C |
| Hepler and Kovacs (2017) | 34 M; 34 FM |
Decision-making TTF | Post CT | TTF frequency, Number of options generated, first option quality and final decision quality = I vs. C; First option generation and final decision speed ↓ I vs. C |
| Moreira et al. (2018) | 49 M | SSGs | Post CT | Efficiency = I vs. C; Total turnovers ↓ I vs. C |
| Bahrami et al. (2020) | 18 M | 3PS test | Pre and post CT | Percentage of 3PS ↓ I vs. C |
| Shaabani et al. (2020) | 72 M | 30 FT | Pre and post CT | Percentage of FT ↓ I vs. C. |
| Filipas et al. (2021) | 19 M | 60 FT | Post CT | FT accuracy ↓ I vs. C; |
3TS, three-point shot; FT, free throw; TTF, take the first heuristic; C, control; I, intervention; M, male; FM, female; CT, cognitive task; SSGs, small-sided-games.