Table 1.
classification | description | percentage of papers |
---|---|---|
power of combined approach | ||
IBO | studies with equally or better fit than IBD (e.g. Mantel test, AEM, networks) to predictions from the biophysical model, were classified as IBO | 59 |
IBD | studies with a significant IBD pattern (e.g. using Mantel test), but with poor correspondence with predictions from the biophysical model | 19 |
unclear | for many studies, e.g. where statistical tests were missing (e.g. assessed by eye, networks or genetic models), it was not possible to make a clear assessment, and those studies were classified as unclear | 22 |